Week 3: Language

 Part 1:

   My girlfriend and I held the 15 minute conversation about our trip to New York during Thanksgiving. We haven't made plans as to what we are going to do and this was an opportunity to get some ideas going. I wanted to see a Knicks game, which was easy to convey using a shooting motion. Food was a little more complicated because of the specific types of foods we wanted to eat as well as what places to see. It was b frustrating for the both of us because I knew what I wanted to convey, but it was harder to use motions and body signals for specific things like going to Rockefeller Center. My girlfriend was getting agitated because she couldn't pick up exactly what I was trying to relay, which dragged on the 'conversation' longer than it needed. During this conversation, I think I had the 'power' because I was in control of trying to get ideas across and she was trying to figure out what I was wanting to say. The power of speech, to me, streamlines ideas better and more efficiently when both parties are able to communicate verbally. Cultures that use spoken words as a means of convey complex ideas run the risk of looking at cultures that don't use spoken words as 'less than' or primitive. I can see autistic people having difficulty relaying complex ideas/feelings through spoken word. It can give another person of the autistic person as being 'weird' and risk of ostracizing them from social circles.

Part 2:

    Communicating using only speech was easier compared to only using gestures and body language. I had to be cognizant of facial expressions and change in tone for the first few minutes but it got easier as the conversation went on.  It was easier for my girlfriend to understand what I was trying to get across but it was more difficult for me because there were parts in the conversation that I wanted to interject some type of emotion or body language but had to restrain myself because of the parameters of the assignment. It is super important to have some sort of influx of your voice or body language to fully convey an idea. A quote I like is "It's not more of what you say but more of how you say it." If you tell someone "I love you" in a monotonic, robotic-like tone, the other person may not fully receive or believe what you are saying. But given some substance and some gestures, then that phrase holds a lot more meaning and is more effective/better received. I think people who haven't been socialized much in their youth may have difficult times reading body language/social cues. I've seen videos of guys talking to women they have interest in dating but the women don't have the same interest. The women's body language is obvious of their lack of interest yet the guys keep pursuing them, oblivious of the lack of reciprocated energy. I can see not reading body language in war situations as a benefit. If you're in a hostile territory and in a town where the locals may not want you there, it can be deceiving if someone comes to you as friendly only to turn around and attack you.

Part3:

    Being able to write out our conversation would made things a lot easier compared to using body language and hand/face gestures. With texting being a more used form of using to communicate with other, being able to write to one another would be more natural, albeit a little longer to get messages/ideas across. Writing has an impact on cultures because it helps them be more concise when relaying information from person-to-person, or generation to generation. Folk tales, recipes, what plants are edible, etc. can aid in preserving and developing cultures. Social media has had a big impact on the spread of ideas throughout the world when it comes to spreading ideas. It allows other people from other cultures to compare and contrast their ways of life and gain more insights into how the world works outside of their own walk of life. 

Comments

  1. Hi!

    After reading your post I realize that verbal articulation makes a difference in how someone can gain information. I believe the issue when some only uses body language can be based on how impatient someone is. Looking back, I am an impatient person and like to get answers fast. While doing my experiment I did not feel this way because I knew it was something I was testing out. I did not feel bothered because I saw it more as a game when it came to using the body language only. It wasn’t something I became impatient about but I was more curious and interested in the process. But it is nice to know we both had a different outcome. I felt communication with body language felt much more simpler since it can to me expressions are important to determine what you may be feeling, without them life feels a bit bland with only articulating words. I agree how both are important for cultures to compare and contract their ways, this will always be a factor in using body language and written language. Nice read!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Initial comment: When all your points are collapsed into one paragraph, it makes it difficult to parse out your responses to each prompt. It is to your advantage to ensure that your answers are clearly indicated. Separate each set of guideline prompts into separate paragraphs.

    Part 1: Good opening description from your own perspective. I would have liked to hear more about your partner's experience. Did she alter the way she spoke to you to support the conversation? Did she ask a lot of "yes" or "no" questions to gather information?

    "I think I had the 'power' because I was in control of trying to get ideas across and she was trying to figure out what I was wanting to say."

    Were you in control? Could you change topics at will? Ask questions? Steer the conversation where you wanted it to go? And if you did feel this way, could it be because your friend let you do this? If you had engaged in this discussion with a stranger on the street, just how much control would you have had? Would they have patiently tolerated your limited communication or might they have just walked away?

    Good discussion on the issue of complex ideas.

    Actually, those in the autism spectrum communicate well with words. It is body language that causes them problems. What we are looking for here is a real-life situation that mirrors the experiment, which produces a power differential between the two sides, with the person who can speak possessing more power than the person who cannot. The non-speaking person is dependent upon the speaking person to help them express themselves. situation that better mirrors this power differential is seen in the interaction between English speakers and non-English speaking immigrant populations. Think about how non-English speaking immigrants are treated in Southern California? Are they treated as equals? Or as more "primitive" as you describe here?

    Part 2: Okay on your description here, but usually the most interesting part of this experiment is the response of the partner. Some have actually gotten angry and stormed out. It would have offered more information for both you and your reader if this had been expanded.

    Let's dig a bit deeper into the benefits of body language. What you offer is a more superficial perspective. What about the ability to figure out if you can trust someone? Or determine if a person is attracted to you? Or what about if a person is lying to you? Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce.

    RE: The man vs women example... Is it an issue of the men not being *able* to read body language? Or just not *wanting* to acknowledge what they are reading? Human males have a reproductive advantage in ignoring female body language. Just because you can read body language doesn't mean you can't choose to ignore it.

    What about those in the autism spectrum? One of the defining characteristics of autism is the inability to read body cues, which is why they have so much difficult in social situations, particularly with sarcasm and jokes.

    The example you offer of the "hostile town" is not the place I would want to NOT read body language! :-) Ignoring body language could deadly. What you are describing is someone lying to you... reading body language is the that might save your life.

    But is there any situation you can think of where body language might actually mislead you, not because the person is lying but because you don't know how to read the body language? Do all cultures use the same system of body language? They all use different systems of spoken/written language, so why would we assume their body language isn't different? If you travel to another country, can you trust the information you get from their body language?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Google limited the length of my comment. I'll finish it here:
    ___________________________________________________________
    Part 3: Good final discussion here. The only point I would make is to your last section... you only really discuss positive impacts. Are there any potential negative ones? Written language allows information to spread globally at a rapid pace. But that is both good information and bad, true information and false. Correct?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment